4.7 Article

Two conditions for galaxy quenching: compact centres and massive haloes

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 448, Issue 1, Pages 237-251

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu2755

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: general; galaxies: groups: general; galaxies: haloes; galaxies: star formation; galaxies: structure

Funding

  1. ISF at HU [24/12]
  2. GIF [G-1052-104.7/2009]
  3. DIP
  4. NSF [AST-1010033, AST 08-08133]
  5. I-CORE Program of the PBC
  6. ISF [1829/12]
  7. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  8. National Science Foundation
  9. U.S. Department of Energy
  10. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  11. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  12. Max Planck Society
  13. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  14. American Museum of Natural History
  15. Astrophysical Institute Potsdam
  16. University of Basel
  17. University of Cambridge
  18. Case Western Reserve University
  19. University of Chicago
  20. Drexel University
  21. Fermilab
  22. Institute for Advanced Study
  23. Japan Participation Group
  24. Johns Hopkins University
  25. Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics
  26. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
  27. Korean Scientist Group
  28. Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST)
  29. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  30. Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA)
  31. Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA)
  32. New Mexico State University
  33. Ohio State University
  34. University of Pittsburgh
  35. University of Portsmouth
  36. Princeton University
  37. United States Naval Observatory
  38. University of Washington
  39. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0808133] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  40. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0808133] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the roles of two classes of quenching mechanisms for central and satellite galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (z < 0.075): those involving the halo and those involving the formation of a compact centre. For central galaxies with inner compactness Sigma(1) (kpc) similar to 10(9-9.4) M-circle dot kpc(-2), the quenched fraction f(q) is strongly correlated with Sigma(1) (kpc) with only weak halo mass M-h dependence. However, at higher and lower Ei kre, specific star formation rate (sSFR) is a strong function of Mh and mostly independent of Sigma(1) (kpc). In other words, Sigma(1) (kpc) similar to 10(9) (9.4) M-circle dot kpc(-2) divides galaxies into those with high sSFR below and low sSFR above this range. In both the upper and lower regimes, increasing Mh shifts the entire sSFR distribution to lower sSFR without a qualitative change in shape. This is true even at fixed Mt, but varying M* at fixed Mh adds no quenching information. Most of the quenched centrals with M-h > 10(11.8) M-circle dot are dense (Sigma(1) (kpc), > 10(9) M-circle dot kpc(-2)), suggesting compaction-related quenching maintained by halo-related quenching. However, 21 per cent are diffuse, indicating only halo quenching. For satellite galaxies in the outskirts of haloes, quenching is a strong function of compactness and a weak function of host M-h. In the inner halo, M-h dominates quenching, with similar to 90 per cent of the satellites being quenched once M-h > 10(13) M-circle dot. This regional effect is greatest for the least massive satellites. As demonstrated via semi-analytic modelling with simple prescriptions for quenching, the observed correlations can be explained if quenching due to central compactness is rapid while quenching due to halo mass is slow.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available