4.7 Article

The neutral hydrogen cosmological mass density at z=5

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 452, Issue 1, Pages 217-234

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv1182

Keywords

quasars: absorption lines; cosmological parameters

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP130100568]
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L0075X/1]
  3. FONDECYT [1140838]
  4. Center of Excellence in Astrophysics and Associated Technologies [PFB 06]
  5. STFC [ST/L00075X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L00075X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the largest homogeneous survey of z > 4.4 damped Lya systems (DLAs) using the spectra of 163 QSOs that comprise the Giant Gemini GMOS (GGG) survey. With this survey we make the most precise high-redshift measurement of the cosmological mass density of neutral hydrogen, Omega(HI). At such high redshift, important systematic uncertainties in the identification of DLAs are produced by strong intergalactic medium absorption and QSO continuum placement. These can cause spurious DLA detections, result in real DLAs being missed or bias the inferred DLA column density distribution. We correct for these effects using a combination of mock and higher resolution spectra, and show that for the GGG DLA sample the uncertainties introduced are smaller than the statistical errors on Omega(HI). We find Omega(HI) = 0.98(-0.18)(+0.20) x 10(-3) at < z > = 4.9, assuming a 20 per cent contribution from lower column density systems below the DLA threshold. By comparing to literature measurements at lower redshifts, we show that Omega(HI) can be described by the functional form Omega(HI) (z) proportional to (1 + z)(0.4). This gradual decrease from z = 5 to 0 is consistent with the bulk of HI gas being a transitory phase fuelling star formation, which is continually replenished by more highly ionized gas from the intergalactic medium and from recycled galactic winds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available