4.1 Article

Incidence for progression of hypervascular HCC in hypovascular hepatic nodules showing hyperintensity on gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary phase in patients with chronic liver diseases

Journal

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 7, Pages 405-413

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11604-014-0323-z

Keywords

Gd-EOB-DTPA; Hepatobiliary phase; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Malignant progression

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the incidence and risk factors for the progression of hyperintense nodules, observed in the hepatobiliary phase of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI), to hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hypovascular nodules (n = 157) showing hyperintensity in the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI were examined in 41 patients. All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) during hepatic arteriography and CT during arterial portography within one month of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. The incidence of progression to hypervascular or classical HCC was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Tumor size was determined by univariate and multivariate analysis to be an important risk factor of hypervascularization (p = 0.041, odds ratio 1.135). The cumulative incidences of hypervascularization in hypovascular nodules showing hyperintensity on the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI were 2.4, 4.5, and 6.2 % at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. The incidence of hypervascularization was significantly increased in nodules > 10 mm in diameter (p = 0.00035). In patients with chronic liver disease, hypovascular nodules presenting as hyperintense in the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and > 10 mm in diameter have malignant potential for progression to hypervascular HCC and require careful management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available