4.2 Article

Acute retinal necrosis: factors associated with anatomic and visual outcomes

Journal

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages 98-103

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10384-012-0211-y

Keywords

Acute retinal necrosis; Retinal detachment; Visual outcome; Prophylactic vitrectomy

Categories

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25462745, 23406031, 23659815, 24592678, 22390065, 23592554] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To examine the factors associated with anatomic and visual outcomes in Japanese patients with acute retinal necrosis (ARN). One hundred four patients with ARN who were followed for more than 1 year at nine referral centers were reviewed. Retinal involvement at initial presentation was classified into four groups: zone 1 (posterior pole, n = 22), zone 2 (midperiphery, n = 54), zone 3 (periphery, n = 25), and unknown (n = 3). Forty-eight eyes underwent prophylactic vitrectomy before development of retinal detachment (vitrectomy group); 56 eyes were treated conventionally without prophylactic vitrectomy (observation group). The retina was attached in 28 of 48 eyes (58.3 %) in the vitrectomy group and 42 of 56 eyes (75.0 %) in the observation group at the final visit (P = 0.071). At 1 year, 56 eyes (53.8 %) had a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/200 or worse. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified zone 1 disease (odds ratio = 4.983) and optic nerve involvement (odds ratio = 5.084) as significantly associated with BCVA of 20/200 or worse. Among the zone 3 eyes, significantly (P = 0.012) more eyes in the observation group than in the vitrectomy group had an attached retina. Prophylactic vitrectomy did not improve the final BCVA in any eyes. Zone 3 eyes had better outcomes without prophylactic vitrectomy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available