4.2 Article

The Association Between Perceived Social Support and Continued Smoking in Cancer Survivors

Journal

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 45-54

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hys182

Keywords

cancer survivor; perceived social support; smoking; smoking cessation

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Center [0910191, 1210150]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the increased survival rate of cancer patients, positive changes in health behaviors, including smoking cessation, are becoming progressively more important. While studies in the general population have demonstrated the beneficial effects of high perceived support of smoking cessation and continuing abstinence, few studies have addressed such issues in cancer survivors. We examined the factors related to continued smoking among cancer survivors with specific attention given to the role of perceived social support. A nationwide, multicenter survey was conducted with 1956 cancer patients. Smoking status at the time of diagnosis and at the time of survey, and perceived social support, as measured by the Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire, were collected by self-reported questionnaire. Among 493 participants who were smoking at the time of cancer diagnosis, 131 (26.6) were continued smokers at the time of survey. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, current alcohol consumption (odds ratio, 3.29; 95 confidence interval, 1.915.65), early cancer stage (P-for trend 0.01), lung cancer diagnosis (odds ratio, 0.41; 95 confidence interval, 0.190.88), and high perceived social support (odds ratio, 0.59; 95 confidence interval, 0.370.96) showed significant associations with continued smoking. Cancer survivors with low perceived social support were more likely to continue smoking. Our study suggests that perceived social support may be an important factor for smoking cessation and maintenance of smoking cessation in this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available