4.2 Article

Involvement of a Psychiatric Consultation Service in a Palliative Care Team at the Japanese Cancer Center Hospital

Journal

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 12, Pages 1139-1146

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyq147

Keywords

cancer; palliative care; psycho-oncology; palliative care team; consultation-liaison psychiatry

Categories

Funding

  1. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22790580] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Close collaboration between the cancer care team service and the psychiatric consultation service is recommended to provide adequate comprehensive care to cancer patients. In Japan, specialized palliative care teams work in conjunction with consultation-liaison psychiatrists as an essential members. There are, however, few studies reporting on these services. We obtained the characteristics, physical and psychiatric symptoms and outcomes of cancer patients by analyzing the database of patients referred to the palliative care team at the National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan. Among consecutive 2000 referrals, most patients referred to the palliative care team present both physical and psychiatric symptoms. Psychiatric diagnoses were provided for similar to 70% of these patients. Consultation-liaison psychiatrists provided medical care to 80% of all the referrals. The main symptoms for psychiatric consultation were delirium (28%), adjustment disorder (18%), major depression (7.6%) and dementia (6.6%). Psychiatric problems are common in cancer patients of the palliative care team. The palliative care team should assess the psychiatric problems in cancer patients, and the involvement of the consultation-liaison psychiatrists in the palliative care teams may be one of the strategies to establish the psychosocial support for cancer patients in the acute hospital settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available