4.7 Article

Revisiting the ultraluminous supersoft source in M 101: an optically thick outflow model

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 456, Issue 2, Pages 1837-1858

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2671

Keywords

accretion, accretion discs; black hole physics; X-rays: individual: M 101 ULX-1

Funding

  1. Curtin University
  2. Tsinghua University (Beijing)
  3. Strasbourg Observatory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The M 101 galaxy contains the best-known example of an ultraluminous supersoft source (ULS), dominated by a thermal component at kT approximate to 0.1 keV. The origin of the thermal component and the relation between ULSs and standard (broad-band spectrum) ultraluminous X-ray sources are still controversial. We re-examined the X-ray spectral and timing properties of the M 101 ULS using archival Chandra and XMM-Newton observations. We show that the X-ray time-variability and spectral properties are inconsistent with standard-disc emission. The characteristic radius R-bb of the thermal emitter varies from epoch to epoch between approximate to 10 000 and approximate to 100 000 km; the colour temperature kTbb varies between approximate to 50 and approximate to 140 eV and the two quantities scale approximately as R-bb proportional to T-bb(-2). In addition to the smooth continuum, we also find (at some epochs) spectral residuals well fitted with thermal-plasma models and absorption edges: we interpret this as evidence that we are looking at a clumpy, multitemperature outflow. We suggest that at sufficiently high accretion rates and inclination angles, the supercritical, radiatively driven outflow becomes effectively optically thick and completely thermalizes the harder X-ray photons from the inner part of the inflow, removing the hard spectral tail. We develop a simple, spherically symmetric outflow model and show that it is consistent with the observed temperatures, radii and luminosities. A larger, cooler photosphere shifts the emission peak into the far-UV and makes the source dimmer in X-rays but possibly ultraluminous in the UV. We compare our results and interpretation with those of Liu et al.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available