4.7 Article

The evolution of the mass ratio of accreting binaries: the role of gas temperature

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 447, Issue 3, Pages 2907-2914

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu2656

Keywords

accretion, accretion discs; hydrodynamics; binaries: general; stars: protostars; stars: statistics

Funding

  1. Poynton Cambridge Australia Scholarship
  2. DISCSIM project - European Research Council [341137, ERC-2013-ADG]
  3. STFC [ST/K000985/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K000985/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We explore an unresolved controversy in the literature about the accuracy of smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) in modelling the accretion of gas on to a binary system, a problem with important applications to the evolution of protobinaries as well as accreting binary supermassive black holes. It has previously been suggested that SPH fails to model the flow of loosely bound material from the secondary to primary Roche lobe and that its general prediction that accretion drives mass ratios upwards is numerically flawed. Here, we show with 2D SPH that this flow from secondary to primary Roche lobe is a sensitive function of gas temperature and that this largely explains the conflicting claims in the literature which have hitherto been based on either 'cold' SPH simulations or 'hot' grid-based calculations. We present simulations of a specimen 'cold' and 'hot' accretion scenario which are numerically converged and evolved into a steady state. Our analysis of the conservation of the Jacobi integral of accreting particles indicates that our results are not strongly compromised by numerical dissipation. We also explore the low resolution limit and find that simulations where the ratio of SPH smoothing length to disc scaleheight at the edge of the circumsecondary is less than 1 accurately capture binary accretion rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available