4.7 Article

CFHTLenS: a Gaussian likelihood is a sufficient approximation for a cosmological analysis of third-order cosmic shear statistics

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 449, Issue 2, Pages 1505-1525

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv339

Keywords

gravitational lensing: weak; methods: statistical; cosmology: observations; dark matter

Funding

  1. Canadian Space Agency
  2. European Commission [MRTN-CT-2006-036133]
  3. National Science Foundation [1066293]
  4. Canada Foundation for Innovation under the auspices of Compute Canada
  5. Government of Ontario
  6. Ontario Research Fund - Research Excellence
  7. University of Toronto
  8. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [639.042.814]
  9. European Research Council under the EC FP7 [279396, 240185]
  10. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  11. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIfAR, Cosmology and Gravity program)
  12. Marie Curie IRGgrant [230924]
  13. NSERC
  14. CITA National Fellowship
  15. DFG Emmy Noether grant [Hi 1495/2-1]
  16. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [Hi 1495/2-1t ER 327/3-1, SI 1769/1-1]
  17. Transregional Collaborative Research Centre [TR 33]
  18. STFC [ST/K000977/1, ST/J001422/1, ST/H002456/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  19. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K000977/1, ST/H002456/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the correlations of the shear signal between triplets of sources in the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey (CFHTLenS) to probe cosmological parameters via the matter bispectrum. In contrast to previous studies, we adopt a non-Gaussian model of the data likelihood which is supported by our simulations of the survey. We find that for state-of-the-art surveys, similar to CFHTLenS, a Gaussian likelihood analysis is a reasonable approximation, albeit small differences in the parameter constraints are already visible. For future surveys we expect that a Gaussian model becomes inaccurate. Our algorithm for a refined non-Gaussian analysis and data compression is then of great utility especially because it is not much more elaborate if simulated data are available. Applying this algorithm to the third-order correlations of shear alone in a blind analysis, we find a good agreement with the standard cosmological model: Sigma(8) = sigma(8)(Omega(m)/0.27)(0.64) = 0.79(-0.11)(+0.08) for a flat Lambda cold dark matter cosmology with h = 0.7 +/- 0.04 (68 per cent credible interval). Nevertheless our models provide only moderately good fits as indicated by chi(2)/dof = 2.9, including a 20 per cent rms uncertainty in the predicted signal amplitude. The models cannot explain a signal drop on scales around 15 arcmin, which may be caused by systematics. It is unclear whether the discrepancy can be fully explained by residual point spread function systematics of which we find evidence at least on scales of a few arcmin. Therefore we need a better understanding of higher order correlations of cosmic shear and their systematics to confidently apply them as cosmological probes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available