4.7 Review

Low-Frequency HIV-1 Drug Resistance Mutations and Risk of NNRTI-Based Antiretroviral Treatment Failure A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

Journal

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 305, Issue 13, Pages 1327-1335

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.375

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  2. Pfizer
  3. Siemens
  4. Merck
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim
  6. Gilead
  7. Roche Diagnostics
  8. GlaxoSmithKline
  9. Tibotec
  10. Abbott
  11. ViiV
  12. Janssen-Cilag
  13. ViiV Healthcare
  14. Avexa
  15. Boehringer-Ingelheim
  16. Human Genome Sciences
  17. Oncolys
  18. Tobira
  19. Vertex
  20. ViroStatistics
  21. Harvard/MIT Health Sciences and Technology-Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  22. Pfizer Inc
  23. Merck Co
  24. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [T32 AI07387]
  25. European Commission [223131]
  26. NIH (Statistical and Data Management Center of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group [ACTG]) [U01 AI068634]
  27. NIH (Harvard University CFAR) [P30 AI060354]
  28. Swiss National Science Foundation [324700-120793, CR32I2-127017]
  29. Gilead Sciences
  30. European Community [223131]
  31. VA Merit Award
  32. NIH [U01 AI 068636, K24 RR016482]
  33. ACTG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context Presence of low-frequency, or minority, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) drug resistance mutations may adversely affect response to antiretroviral treatment (ART), but evidence regarding the effects of such mutations on the effectiveness of first-line ART is conflicting. Objective To evaluate the association of preexisting drug-resistant HIV-1 minority variants with risk of first-line nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based antiretroviral virologic failure. Data Sources Systematic review of published and unpublished studies in PubMed (1966 through December 2010), EMBASE (1974 through December 2010), conference abstracts, and article references. Authors of all studies were contacted for detailed laboratory, ART, and adherence data. Study Selection and Data Abstraction Studies involving ART-naive participants initiating NNRTI-based regimens were included. Participants were included if all drugs in their ART regimen were fully active by standard HIV drug resistance testing. Cox proportional hazard models using pooled patient-level data were used to estimate the risk of virologic failure based on a Prentice weighted case-cohort analysis stratified by study. Data Synthesis Individual data from 10 studies and 985 participants were available for the primary analysis. Low-frequency drug resistance mutations were detected in 187 participants, including 117 of 808 patients in the cohort studies. Low-frequency HIV-1 drug resistance mutations were associated with an increased risk of virologic failure (hazard ratio (HR], 2.3 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.7-3.3]; P < .001) after controlling for medication adherence, race/ethnicity, baseline CD4 cell count, and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels. Increased risk of virologic failure was most strongly associated with minority variants resistant to NNRTIs (HR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.9-3.5]; P < .001). Among participants from the cohort studies, 35% of those with detectable minority variants experienced virologic failure compared with 15% of those without minority variants. The presence of minority variants was associated with 2.5 to 3 times the risk of virologic failure at either 95% or greater or less than 95% overall medication adherence. A dose-dependent increased risk of virologic failure was found in participants with a higher proportion or quantity of drug-resistant variants. Conclusion In a pooled analysis, low-frequency HIV-1 drug resistance mutations, particularly involving NNRTI resistance, were significantly associated with a dose-dependent increased risk of virologic failure with first-line ART. JAMA. 2011;305(13):1327-1335 www.jama.com

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available