4.7 Article

Association Between Adiposity in Midlife and Older Age and Risk of Diabetes in Older Adults

Journal

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 303, Issue 24, Pages 2504-2512

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.843

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [N01-HC-85079, N01-HC-85086, N01-HC-35129, N01-HC-15103, N01-HC-55222, N01-HC-75150, N01-HC-45133, U01 HL080295, R01 HL-075366, R01 HL-094555]
  2. National Institute on Aging [R01 AG-023629, R01 AG-15928, R01 AG-20098, AG-027058]
  3. University of Pittsburgh Claude
  4. University of Pittsburgh Claude. D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center [P30-AG-024827]
  5. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context Adiposity is a well-recognized risk factor for type 2 diabetes among young and middle-aged adults, but the relationship between body composition and type 2 diabetes is not well described among older adults. Objective To examine the relationship between adiposity, changes in adiposity, and risk of incident type 2 diabetes in adults 65 years of age and older. Design, Setting, and Participants Prospective cohort study (1989-2007) of 4193 men and women 65 years of age and older in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Measures of adiposity were derived from anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance data at baseline and anthropometry repeated 3 years later. Main Outcome Measure Incident diabetes was ascertained based on use of antidiabetic medication or a fasting glucose level of 126 mg/dL or greater. Results Over median follow-up of 12.4 years (range, 0.9-17.8 years), 339 cases of incident diabetes were ascertained (7.1/1000 person-years). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of type 2 diabetes for participants in the highest quintile of baseline measures compared with those in the lowest was 4.3 (95% CI, 2.9-6.5) for body mass index (BMI [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared]), 3.0 (95% CI, 2.0-4.3) for BMI at 50 years of age, 4.2 (95% CI, 2.8-6.4) for weight, 4.0 (95% CI, 2.6-6.0) for fat mass, 4.2 (95% CI, 2.8-6.2) for waist circumference, 2.4 (95% CI, 1.6-3.5) for waist-hip ratio, and 3.8 (95% CI, 2.6-5.5) for waist-height ratio. However, when stratified by age, participants 75 years of age and older had HRs approximately half as large as those 65 to 74 years of age. Compared with weight-stable participants (+/- 2 kg), those who gained the most weight from 50 years of age to baseline (>= 9 kg), and from baseline to the third follow-up visit (>= 6 kg), had HRs for type 2 diabetes of 2.8 (95% CI, 1.9-4.3) and 2.0 (95% CI, 1.1-3.7), respectively. Participants with a greater than 10-cm increase in waist size from baseline to the third follow-up visit had an HR of type 2 diabetes of 1.7 (95% CI, 1.1-2.8) compared with those who gained or lost 2 cm or less. Conclusion Among older adults, overall and central adiposity, and weight gain during middle age and after the age of 65 years are associated with risk of diabetes. JAMA. 2010; 303(24): 2504-2512

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available