4.6 Article

Volatile Compounds from Grape Skin, Juice and Wine from Five Interspecific Hybrid Grape Cultivars Grown in Quebec (Canada) for Wine Production

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 10980-11016

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules200610980

Keywords

Vitis; cold climate viticulture; GC-MS-SPME; volatile compounds; Frontenac; Marquette; Marechal Foch; Sabrevois; St. Croix

Funding

  1. Ministere de l'Agriculture, des Pecheries et de l'Alimentation (MAPAQ) from the Gouvernement du Quebec
  2. Association des vignerons du Quebec

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developed from crosses between Vitis vinifera and North American Vitis species, interspecific hybrid grape varieties are becoming economically significant in northern areas, where they are now extensively grown for wine production. However, the varietal differences between interspecific hybrids are not well defined, nor are the relationships between hybrid grape and wine composition, which causes significant drawbacks in the development of viticulture and winemaking of northern wines. In an effort to increase our understanding of interspecific hybrids, we have characterized the free volatile compounds profiles of berries (juice and skin) and wines of five red hybrid varieties (Frontenac, Marquette, Marechal Foch, Sabrevois and St. Croix) grown in Quebec (Canada), using GC-MS(TOF)-SPME. In grapes and wines, significantly higher levels of C-6 and other fatty acid degradation products (FADP) were found in Frontenac, Marechal Foch and Marquette. Terpenes were primarily located in the skin, with Marquette showing the highest level for these compounds. Both the level of terpenes and the level of FADP in grape were strongly correlated with their respective levels in wine, as demonstrated by the redundancy analyses. Nonanal, (E,Z)-2,6-nonadienal, -damascenone, ethyl octanoate and isoamyl acetate showed the highest OAVs in the wines of the studied varieties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available