4.7 Review

Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adults A Systematic Review

Journal

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 301, Issue 22, Pages 2362-2375

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.815

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Department for International Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context The benefit of corticosteroids in severe sepsis and septic shock remains controversial. Objective We examined the benefits and risks of corticosteroid treatment in severe sepsis and septic shock and the influence of dose and duration. Data Sources We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS (through March 2009) databases as well as reference lists of articles and proceedings of major meetings, and we contacted trial authors. Study Selection Randomized and quasi-randomized trials of corticosteroids vs placebo or supportive treatment in adult patients with severe sepsis/septic shock per the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine consensus definition were included. Data Extraction All reviewers agreed on trial eligibility. One reviewer extracted data, which were checked by the other reviewers and by the trials' authors whenever possible. Some unpublished data were obtained from the trials' authors. The primary outcome for this review was 28-day mortality. Results We identified 17 randomized trials (n=2138) and 3 quasi-randomized trials (n=246) that had acceptable methodological quality to pool in a meta-analysis. Twenty-eight-day mortality for treated vs control patients was 388/1099 (35.3%) vs 400/1039 (38.5%) in randomized trials (risk ratio [RR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-1.00; P=.05; I-2=53% by random-effects model) and 28/121 (23.1%) vs 24/125 (19.2%) in quasi-randomized trials (RR, 1.05, 95% CI, 0.69-1.58; P=.83). In 12 trials investigating prolonged low-dose corticosteroid treatment, 28-day mortality for treated vs control patients was 236/629 (37.5%) vs 264/599 (44%) ( RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.97; P=.02). This treatment increased 28-day shock reversal ( 6 trials; 322/481 [66.9%] vs 276/471 [58.6%]; RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.23; P=.02; I-2=4%) and reduced intensive care unit length of stay by 4.49 days (8 trials; 95% CI, -7.04 to -1.94; P<.001; I-2=0%) without increasing the risk of gastroduodenal bleeding (13 trials; 65/800 [8.1%] vs 56/764 [7.3%]; P=.50; I-2=0%), superinfection (14 trials; 184/998 [18.4%] vs 170/950 [17.9%]; P=.92; I-2=8%), or neuromuscular weakness (3 trials; 4/407 [1%] vs 7/404 [1.7%]; P=.58; I-2=30%). Corticosteroids increased the risk of hyperglycemia (9 trials; 363/703 [51.6%] vs 308/670 [46%]; P<.001; I-2=0%) and hypernatremia (3 trials; 127/404 [31.4%] vs 77/401 [ 19.2%]; P<.001; I-2=0%). Conclusions Corticosteroid therapy has been used in varied doses for sepsis and related syndromes for more than 50 years, with no clear benefit on mortality. Since 1998, studies have consistently used prolonged low-dose corticosteroid therapy, and analysis of this subgroup suggests a beneficial drug effect on short-term mortality. JAMA. 2009;301(22):2362-2375 www.jama.com

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available