4.7 Article

Financial Incentive-Based Approaches for Weight Loss A Randomized Trial

Journal

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 300, Issue 22, Pages 2631-2637

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2008.804

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging [P30 AG12836]
  2. Boettner Center for Pensions and Retirement Security at the University of Pennsylvania
  3. National Institute of Child Health and Development Population Research Infrastructure Program [R24 HD-044964]
  4. University of Pennsylvania [58-4000-70058]
  5. S Department of Agriculture
  6. Economic Research Service
  7. Hewlett Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context Identifying effective obesity treatment is both a clinical challenge and a public health priority due to the health consequences of obesity. Objective To determine whether common decision errors identified by behavioral economists such as prospect theory, loss aversion, and regret could be used to design an effective weight loss intervention. Design, Setting, and Participants Fifty- seven healthy participants aged 30- 70 years with a body mass index of 30- 40 were randomized to 3 weight loss plans: monthly weigh- ins, a lottery incentive program, or a deposit contract that allowed for participant matching, with a weight loss goal of 1 lb ( 0.45 kg) a week for 16 weeks. Participants were recruited May- August 2007 at the Philadelphia VA Medical Center in Pennsylvania and were followed up through June 2008. Main Outcome Measures Weight loss after 16 weeks. Results The incentive groups lost significantly more weight than the control group ( mean, 3.9 lb). Compared with the control group, the lottery group lost a mean of 13.1 lb ( 95% confidence interval [ CI] of the difference in means, 1.95- 16.40; P=. 02) and the deposit contract group lost a mean of 14.0 lb ( 95% CI of the difference in means, 3.69- 16.43; P =. 006). About half of those in both incentive groups met the 16- lb target weight loss: 47.4% ( 95% CI, 24.5%- 71.1%) in the deposit contract group and 52.6% ( 95% CI, 28.9%- 75.6%) in the lottery group, whereas 10.5% ( 95% CI, 1.3%- 33.1%; P=. 01) in the control group met the 16- lb target. Although the net weight loss between enrollment in the study and at the end of 7 months was larger in the incentive groups ( 9.2 lb; t= 1.21; 95% CI, - 3.20 to 12.66; P=. 23, in the lottery group and 6.2 lb; t= 0.52; 95% CI, - 5.17 to 8.75; P=. 61 in the deposit contract group) than in the control group ( 4.4 lb), these differences were not statistically significant. However, incentive participants weighed significantly less at 7 months than at the study start ( P=. 01 for the lottery group; P=. 03 for the deposit contract group) whereas controls did not. Conclusions The use of economic incentives produced significant weight loss during the 16 weeks of intervention that was not fully sustained. The longer- term use of incentives should be evaluated. Trial Registration clinicaltrials. gov Identifier: NCT00520611.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available