4.7 Article

Discordance between patient-predicted and model-predicted life expectancy among ambulatory patients with heart failure

Journal

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 299, Issue 21, Pages 2533-2542

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.299.21.2533

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [T32 HL069749, 2 T32HL069749-04, K23 HL72357-01A] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context Patients with chronic heart failure have impaired long- term survival, but their own expectations regarding prognosis have not been well studied. Objectives To quantify expectations for survival in patients with heart failure, to compare patient expectations to model predictions, and to identify factors associated with discrepancies between patient- predicted and model- predicted prognosis. Design, Setting, and Participants Prospective face- to- face survey of patients from the single- center Duke Heart Failure Disease Management Program between July and December 2004, with follow- up through February 2008. Patient- predicted life expectancy was obtained using a visual analog scale. Model- predicted life expectancy was calculated using the Seattle Heart Failure Model. Actuarial- predicted life expectancy, based on age and sex alone, was calculated using life tables. Observed survival was determined from review of medical records and search of the Social Security Death Index. Main Outcome Measure Life expectancy ratio ( LER), defined as the ratio of patient-predicted to model- predicted life expectancy. Results The cohort consisted of 122 patients ( mean age, 62 years; 47% African American, 42% New York Heart Association [ NYHA] class III or IV). On average, patients overestimated their life expectancy relative to model- predicted life expectancy ( median patient-predicted life expectancy, 13.0 years; model- predicted expectancy, 10.0 years). Median LER was 1.4 ( interquartile range, 0.8- 2.5). Younger age, increased NYHA class, lower ejection fraction, and less depression were the most significant predictors of higher LER. During a median follow- up of 3.1 years, 29% of the original cohort died. There was no association between higher LER and improved survival ( adjusted hazard ratio for overestimated compared with concordant LER, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.46- 2.42). Conclusions Ambulatory patients with heart failure tended to substantially overestimate their life expectancy compared with model- based predictions for survival. Because differences in perceived survival could affect decision making regarding advanced therapies and end- of- life planning, the causes of these discordant predictions warrant further study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available