4.3 Article

Kenya AIDS Indicator Surveys 2007 and 2012: Implications for Public Health Policies for HIV Prevention and Treatment

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000123

Keywords

Kenya; HIV/AIDS; AIDS Indicator Survey; surveillance; policy

Funding

  1. National AIDS and STI Control Programme (STI)
  2. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS)
  3. National Public Health Laboratory Services (NPHLS)
  4. National AIDS Control Council (NACC)
  5. National Council for Population and Development (NCPD)
  6. Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)
  7. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC/Kenya)
  8. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC/Atlanta)
  9. United States Agency for International Development (USAID/Kenya)
  10. University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)
  11. Joint United Nations Team on HIV/AIDS
  12. Japan International Cooperation Agency
  13. Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation (EGPAF)
  14. Liverpool Voluntary Counselling and Testing (LVCT)
  15. African Medical and Research Foundation (AMREF)
  16. World Bank
  17. Global Fund
  18. US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief through US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Global HIV/AIDS [PS001805, GH000069, PS001814]
  19. Joint United Nations Team for HIV/AIDS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIDS Indicator Surveys are standardized surveillance tools used by countries with generalized HIV epidemics to provide, in a timely fashion, indicators for effective monitoring of HIV. Such data should guide responses to the HIV epidemic, meet program reporting requirements, and ensure comparability of findings across countries and over time. Kenya has conducted 2 AIDS Indicator Surveys, in 2007 (KAIS 2007) and 2012-2013 (KAIS 2012). These nationally representative surveys have provided essential epidemiologic, socio-demographic, behavioral, and biologic data on HIV and related indicators to evaluate the national HIV response and inform policies for prevention and treatment of the disease. We present a summary of findings from KAIS 2007 and KAIS 2012 and the impact that these data have had on changing HIV policies and practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available