4.3 Article

A Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of Coformulated Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Versus Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate for Initial Treatment of HIV-1 Infection: Analysis of Week 96 Results

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318289545c

Keywords

HIV; stribild; cobicistat; phase 3 randomized trial; efficacy; safety

Funding

  1. Gilead Sciences
  2. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  3. Janssen Therapeutics
  4. GlaxoSmithKline
  5. Merck Laboratories
  6. Tibotec
  7. Abbott Laboratories
  8. Aeliron Scientific
  9. anssen Therapeutics
  10. Achillion Pharmaceuticals
  11. Avexa
  12. Boehringer Ingelheim
  13. Hoff mann LaRoche
  14. Idenix, Janssen
  15. Merck
  16. Pfizer
  17. Sangamo
  18. Taimed
  19. Tobira
  20. Vertex
  21. ViiV
  22. Janssen
  23. Janssen Therapeutics and Gilead Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report week 96 results from a phase 3 trial of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF, n = 348) vs efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EFV/FTC/TDF, n = 352). At week 48, EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF was noninferior to EFV/FTC/TDF (88% vs 84%, difference + 3.6%, 95% confidence interval: -1.6% to 8.8%). Virologic success (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) was maintained at week 96 (84% vs 82%, difference +2.7%, 95% CI: -2.9% to 8.3%). Discontinuation due to adverse events was low (5% vs 7%). Median changes in serum creatinine (mg/dL) at week 96 were similar to week 48. These results support the durable efficacy and long-term safety of EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available