4.3 Article

HIV-1 Viral Subtype Differences in the Rate of CD4+ T-Cell Decline Among HIV Seroincident Antiretroviral Naive Persons in Rakai District, Uganda

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181c98fc0

Keywords

HIV-1 subtypes; rate of CD4(+); cell decline; HIV disease progression

Funding

  1. Department of the Army
  2. Department of the Army, United States Army Medical Research and Material Command
  3. Henry M. Jackson Foundation
  4. Fogarty Foundation [5D43TW00010, 2 D 43 TW000010-19]
  5. NIH
  6. Case Western Reserve University, USA
  7. Division of Intramural Research, NIAID, NIH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Data on the effect of HIV-1 viral subtype on CD4(+) T-cell decline are limited. Methods: We assessed the rate of CD4(+) T-cell decline per year among 312 HIV seroincident persons infected with different HIV-1 subtypes. Rates of CD4(+) decline by HIV-1 subtype were determined by linear mixed effects models, using an unstructured convariance structure. Results: A total of 59.6% had D, 15.7% A, 18.9% recombinant viruses (R), and 5.8% multiple subtypes (M). For all subtypes combined, the overall rate of CD4(+) T-cell decline was -34.5 [95% confidence interval (CI), -47.1, -22.0] cells/mu L per yr, adjusted for age, sex, baseline CD4(+) counts, and viral load. Compared with subtype A, the adjusted rate of CD4 cell loss was -73.7/mu L/yr (95% CI, -113.5, -33.8, P < 0.001) for subtype D, -43.2/mu L/yr ( 95% CI, -90.2, 3.8, P = 0.072) for recombinants, and -63.9/mu L/yr ( 95% CI, -132.3, 4.4, P = 0.067) for infection with multiple HIV subtypes. Square-root transformation of CD4(+) cell counts did not change the results. Conclusions: Infection with subtype D is associated with significantly faster rates of CD4(+) T-cell loss than subtype A. This may explain the more rapid disease progression for subtype D compared with subtype A.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available