4.6 Article

Long-Term Outcomes After Surgical Versus Transcatheter Closure of Atrial Septal Defects in Adults

Journal

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages 497-503

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.12.126

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives The purpose of this study was to assess the comparative effectiveness and long-termsafety of transcatheter versus surgical closure of secundum atrial septal defects (ASD) in adults. Background Transcatheter ASD closure has largely replaced surgery in most industrialized countries, but long-term data comparing the 2 techniques are limited. Methods We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study of all patients, ages 18 to 75 years, who had surgical or transcatheter ASD closure in Quebec, Canada's second-largest province, using provincial administrative databases. Primary outcomes were long-term (5-year) reintervention and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were short-term (1-year) onset of congestive heart failure, stroke, or transient ischemic attack, and markers of health service use. Results Of the 718 ASD closures performed between 1988 and 2005, 383 were surgical and 335 were transcatheter. The long-term reintervention rate was higher in patients with transcatheter ASD closure (7.9% vs. 0.3% at 5 years, p = 0.0038), but the majority of these reinterventions occurred in the first year. Long-term mortality with the transcatheter technique was not inferior to surgical ASD closure (5.3% vs. 6.3% at 5 years, p = 1.00). Secondary outcomes were similar in the 2 groups. Conclusions Transcatheter ASD closure is associated with a higher long-term reintervention rate and long-term mortality that is not inferior to surgery. Overall, these data support the current practice of using transcatheter ASD closure in the majority of eligible patients and support the decision to intervene on ASD with significant shunts before symptoms become evident. (C) 2013 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available