4.6 Article

Autopsy Validation Study of the Academic Research Consortium Stent Thrombosis Definition

Journal

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 554-559

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.01.011

Keywords

myocardial infarction; stent; thrombosis

Funding

  1. DCRI
  2. Bristol-Myers Squibb/sanofi-aventis
  3. Medtronic
  4. St. Jude Medical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives This study sought to validate the sensitivity and specificity of the Academic Research Consortium's (ARC) classification of stent thrombosis. Background Classification of stent thrombosis according to ARC criteria has become widely accepted. The criteria have not been validated against an autopsy standard. Methods An autopsy registry of 139 subjects with prior coronary stenting underwent detailed histopathological analysis to assess for stent thrombosis. Based on clinical data only, cases were adjudicated according to ARC stent thrombosis criteria, including a proposed modification of the possible classification to include death beyond 30 days due only to sudden death or acute ischemia. Results Autopsy results confirmed 51 cases as positive and 88 as negative for stent thrombosis. Clinical adjudication classified 105 cases as definite (10), probable (31), or possible (64) ARC stent thrombosis. Specificity was high for definite (99%) and definite plus probable (83%) criteria, but sensitivity was poor at 18% and 51%, respectively. Including the possible cases improved sensitivity to 92% but reduced specificity to 34% (58 false positives). The modified possible criteria eliminated 13 false positive cases (specificity = 49%) and was the best approximation of a hypothetical gold standard in a sensitivity analysis if late death represented at least 20% of all stent thrombosis cases. Conclusions In a selected autopsy sample, restricting ARC stent thrombosis to definite or definite plus probable criteria results in substantial under-reporting of confirmed cases. Inclusion of a modified possible classification may provide the best estimate of late and very late stent thrombosis rates. (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2011;4:554-9) (C) 2011 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available