4.7 Article

miR-221/222 Are Involved in Response to Sunitinib Treatment in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Journal

MOLECULAR THERAPY
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages 1748-1758

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1038/mt.2015.129

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research [MOP 119606]
  2. Kidney Foundation of Canada [KFOC130030]
  3. Kidney Cancer Research Network of Canada
  4. Prostate Cancer Canada Movember Discovery Grants [D2013-39]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sunitinib is a multitargeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for metastatic renal cancer. There are no biomarkers that can predict sunitinib response. Such markers are needed to avoid administration of costly medication with side effects to patients who would not benefit from it. We compared global miRNA expression between patients with a short (<= 12 months) versus prolonged (> 12 months) progression-free survival (PFS) under sunitinib as first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We identified a number of differentially expressed miRNAs and developed miRNA statistical models that can accurately distinguish between the two groups. We validated our models in the discovery set and an independent set of 57 patients. Target prediction and pathway analysis showed that these miRNAs are involved in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), TGF beta, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-mediated signaling and cell-cell communication. We tested the effect of these miRNAs on cellular proliferation and angiogenesis. We validated the negative correlation between miR221 and its target, VEGFR2. miR-221 overexpression was associated with a poor PFS while its target, VEGFR2 was associated with longer survival. Gain of function experiments showed that miR-221 and miR-222 decreased angiogenesis and cellular proliferation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) while increasing cellular proliferation in ACHN cells. miRNAs represent potential predictive markers for sunitinib response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available