4.8 Article

Using the class 1 integron-integrase gene as a proxy for anthropogenic pollution

Journal

ISME JOURNAL
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 1269-1279

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2014.226

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. Alfred P Sloan Foundation Microbiology of the Built Environment program
  3. National Science Foundation RAPID award [1402651]
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [FOR 566, SM59/5-3]
  5. Umweltbundesamt [3713 63 402]
  6. US National Science Foundation
  7. National Science Foundation of China
  8. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  9. Directorate For Engineering [1402651] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Around all human activity, there are zones of pollution with pesticides, heavy metals, pharmaceuticals, personal care products and the microorganisms associated with human waste streams and agriculture. This diversity of pollutants, whose concentration varies spatially and temporally, is a major challenge for monitoring. Here, we suggest that the relative abundance of the clinical class 1 integron-integrase gene, intI1, is a good proxy for pollution because: (1) intI1 is linked to genes conferring resistance to antibiotics, disinfectants and heavy metals; (2) it is found in a wide variety of pathogenic and nonpathogenic bacteria; (3) its abundance can change rapidly because its host cells can have rapid generation times and it can move between bacteria by horizontal gene transfer; and (4) a single DNA sequence variant of intI1 is now found on a wide diversity of xenogenetic elements, these being complex mosaic DNA elements fixed through the agency of human selection. Here we review the literature examining the relationship between anthropogenic impacts and the abundance of intI1, and outline an approach by which intI1 could serve as a proxy for anthropogenic pollution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available