4.8 Article

Evolutionary analysis of a streamlined lineage of surface ocean Roseobacters

Journal

ISME JOURNAL
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages 1428-1439

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2013.248

Keywords

Roseobacter; single-cell genomics; GC content; natural selection; genetic drift; genome streamlining

Funding

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  2. National Science Foundation [MCB-0702125]
  3. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [1232982] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The vast majority of surface ocean bacteria are uncultivated. Compared with their cultured relatives, they frequently exhibit a streamlined genome, reduced G+C content and distinct gene repertoire. These genomic traits are relevant to environmental adaptation, and have generally been thought to become fixed in marine bacterial populations through selection. Using single-cell genomics, we sequenced four uncultivated cells affiliated with the ecologically relevant Roseobacter clade and used a composition-heterogeneous Bayesian phylogenomic model to resolve these single-cell genomes into a new clade. This lineage has no representatives in culture, yet accounts for similar to 35% of Roseobacters in some surface ocean waters. Analyses of multiple genomic traits, including genome size, G+C content and percentage of noncoding DNA, suggest that these single cells are representative of oceanic Roseobacters but divergent from isolates. Population genetic analyses showed that substitution of physicochemically dissimilar amino acids and replacement of G+C-rich to G+C-poor codons are accelerated in the uncultivated clade, processes that are explained equally well by genetic drift as by the more frequently invoked explanation of natural selection. The relative importance of drift vs selection in this clade, and perhaps in other marine bacterial clades with streamlined G+C-poor genomes, remains unresolved until more evidence is accumulated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available