4.8 Article

A metagenomic assessment of winter and summer bacterioplankton from Antarctica Peninsula coastal surface waters

Journal

ISME JOURNAL
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages 1901-1915

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2012.31

Keywords

Antarctic bacterioplankton; metagenomics; chemolithoautotrophy

Funding

  1. Department of Energy
  2. NSF [DBI-0532893]
  3. National Science Foundation [ANT 0632389, ANT 0632278, 0217282]
  4. Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antarctic surface oceans are well-studied during summer when irradiance levels are high, sea ice is melting and primary productivity is at a maximum. Coincident with this timing, the bacterioplankton respond with significant increases in secondary productivity. Little is known about bacterioplankton in winter when darkness and sea-ice cover inhibit photoautotrophic primary production. We report here an environmental genomic and small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) analysis of winter and summer Antarctic Peninsula coastal seawater bacterioplankton. Intense inter-seasonal differences were reflected through shifts in community composition and functional capacities encoded in winter and summer environmental genomes with significantly higher phylogenetic and functional diversity in winter. In general, inferred metabolisms of summer bacterioplankton were characterized by chemoheterotrophy, photoheterotrophy and aerobic anoxygenic photosynthesis while the winter community included the capacity for bacterial and archaeal chemolithoautotrophy. Chemolithoautotrophic pathways were dominant in winter and were similar to those recently reported in global 'dark ocean' mesopelagic waters. If chemolithoautotrophy is widespread in the Southern Ocean in winter, this process may be a previously unaccounted carbon sink and may help account for the unexplained anomalies in surface inorganic nitrogen content. The ISME Journal (2012) 6, 1901-1915; doi:10.1038/ismej.2012.31; published online 26 April 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available