4.8 Article

Intraspecific genotypic richness and relatedness predict the invasibility of microbial communities

Journal

ISME JOURNAL
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages 1108-1114

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2011.9

Keywords

Pseudomonas fluorescens; allelopathy; biological invasions; biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationship; complementarity; niche pre-emption

Funding

  1. Division Of Earth Sciences
  2. Directorate For Geosciences [0920718] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biological invasions can lead to extinction events in resident communities and compromise ecosystem functioning. We tested the effect of two widespread biodiversity measurements, genotypic richness and genotypic dissimilarity on community invasibility. We manipulated the genetic structure of bacterial communities (Pseudomonas fluorescens) and submitted them to invasion by Serratia liquefaciens. We show that the two diversity measures impact on invasibility via distinct and additive mechanisms. Genotypic dissimilarity of the resident communities linearly increased productivity and in parallel decreased invasion success, indicating that high dissimilarity prevents invasion through niche pre- emption. By contrast, genotypic richness exerted a hump-shaped effect on invasion and was linked to the production of toxins antagonistic to the invader. This effect peaked at intermediate richness, suggesting that high richness levels may increase invasibility. Invasibility could be well predicted by the combination of these two mechanisms, documenting that both genotypic richness and dissimilarity need to be considered, if we are to understand the biotic properties determining the susceptibility of ecosystems to biological invasions. The ISME Journal (2011) 5, 1108-1114; doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.9; published online 24 February 2011 Subject Category: microbial population and community ecology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available