Journal
ISME JOURNAL
Volume 4, Issue 8, Pages 1075-1077Publisher
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2010.29
Keywords
metagenomics; statistics; sampling bias
Categories
Funding
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
- Society of General Microbiology
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In gene-centric comparative metagenomics, differences in observed relative gene abundances among samples are often assumed to reflect the biological importance of individual genes in different habitats. Statistical tests and data mining for genes that represent habitat-specific adaptations are frequently based on this measure. We demonstrate that this measure is biased by the average genome size of the communities sampled. Average genome sizes can be estimated from the metagenomic data themselves, and taken into account in comparative analyses. We suggest that this would enable ecologically more meaningful comparisons, especially when the average genome sizes of compared communities differ substantially. We illustrate the influence of average genome-size differences on comparative analyses, with an example to highlight the need for further exploration of this bias. The ISME Journal (2010) 4, 1075-1077; doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.29; published online 25 March 2010
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available