4.8 Article

Soil amoebae rapidly change bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere of Arabidopsis thaliana

Journal

ISME JOURNAL
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages 675-684

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2009.11

Keywords

Acanthamoeba; Arabidopsis; rhizosphere; bacterial diversity; DGGE; FISH

Funding

  1. Helmholtz Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We constructed an experimental model system to study the effects of grazing by a common soil amoeba, Acanthamoeba castellanii, on the composition of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of Arabidopsis thaliana. Amoebae showed distinct grazing preferences for specific bacterial taxa, which were rapidly replaced by grazing tolerant taxa in a highly reproducible way. The relative proportion of active bacteria increased although bacterial abundance was strongly decreased by amoebae. Specific bacterial taxa had disappeared already two days after inoculation of amoebae. The decrease in numbers was most pronounced in Betaproteobacteria and Firmicutes. In contrast, Actinobacteria, Nitrospira, Verrucomicrobia and Planctomycetes increased. Although other groups, such as betaproteobacterial ammonia oxidizers and Gammaproteobacteria did not change in abundance, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis with specific primers for pseudomonads (Gammaproteobacteria) revealed both specific changes in community composition as well as shifts in functional genes (gacA) involved in bacterial defence responses. The resulting positive feedback on plant growth in the amoeba treatment confirms that bacterial grazers play a dominant role in structuring bacteria-plant interactions. This is the first detailed study documenting how rapidly protozoan grazers induce shifts in rhizosphere bacterial community composition. The ISME Journal (2009) 3, 675-684; doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.11; published online 26 February 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available