4.6 Article

The gut microbiota modulates host amino acid and glutathione metabolism in mice

Journal

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/msb.20156487

Keywords

genome-scale metabolic models; germ-free mice; glutathione metabolism; metabolomics; transcriptomics

Funding

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  2. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  3. Torsten Soderbergs Stiftelse
  4. European Commission FP7 project METACARDIS [HEALTH-F4-2012-305312]
  5. Novo Nordisk A/S
  6. Novo Nordisk Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The gut microbiota has been proposed as an environmental factor that promotes the progression of metabolic diseases. Here, we investigated how the gut microbiota modulates the global metabolic differences in duodenum, jejunum, ileum, colon, liver, and two white adipose tissue depots obtained from conventionally raised (CONV-R) and germ-free (GF) mice using gene expression data and tissue-specific genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs). We created a generic mouse metabolic reaction (MMR) GEM, reconstructed 28 tissue-specific GEMs based on proteomics data, and manually curated GEMs for small intestine, colon, liver, and adipose tissues. We used these functional models to determine the global metabolic differences between CONV-R and GF mice. Based on gene expression data, we found that the gut microbiota affects the host amino acid (AA) metabolism, which leads to modifications in glutathione metabolism. To validate our predictions, we measured the level of AAs and N-acetylated AAs in the hepatic portal vein of CONV-R and GF mice. Finally, we simulated the metabolic differences between the small intestine of the CONV-R and GF mice accounting for the content of the diet and relative gene expression differences. Our analyses revealed that the gut microbiota influences host amino acid and glutathione metabolism in mice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available