4.6 Article

Response of sweet orange cv 'Lane late' to deficit irrigation in two rootstocks.: I:: water relations, leaf gas exchange and vegetative growth

Journal

IRRIGATION SCIENCE
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 415-425

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00271-008-0106-3

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of a deficit-irrigation (DI) strategy on soil-plant water relations and gas exchange activity was analysed during a 3-year period in mature 'Lane late' (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osb.) citrus trees grafted on two different rootstocks, 'Cleopatra' mandarin (Citrus reshni Hort. ex Tanaka ) and 'Carrizo' citrange (C. sinensis L., Osbeck x Poncirus trifoliata L.). Two treatments were applied for each rootstock: a control treatment, irrigated at 100% ETc (crop evapotranspiration) during the entire season, and a DI treatment, irrigated at 100% ETc, except during Phase I (cell division) and Phase III (ripening and harvest) of fruit growth, when complete irrigation cut-off was applied. Under soil water deficit, the seasonal variations of soil water content suggested that 'Cleopatra' mandarin had a better root efficiency for soil water extraction than 'Carrizo' citrange. Moreover, in all years, trees on 'Cleopatra' reached a lower water-stress level (midday xylem water potential values (Psi(md)) > -2 MPa), maintaining a better plant water status during the water-stress periods than trees on 'Carrizo' (Psi(md) < -2 MPa). Similarly, net CO2 assimilation rate (A) was higher in trees on 'Cleopatra' during the water-stress periods. In addition, the better plant water status in trees on 'Cleopatra' under DI conditions stimulated a greater vegetative growth compared to trees on 'Carrizo'. From a physiological point of view, 'Cleopatra' mandarin was more tolerant of severe water stress (applied in Phases I and III of fruit growth) than 'Carrizo' citrange.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available