4.5 Article

Effects of gas injection with multihole orifices in upleg snorkel on bubble behaviour and decarburisation rate during RH refining

Journal

IRONMAKING & STEELMAKING
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 386-390

Publisher

MANEY PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1179/1743281211Y.0000000068

Keywords

RH degasser; Multihole orifice; Bubble behaviour; Decarburisation rate; Volumetric mass transfer coefficient; Physical model

Funding

  1. State Eleventh Five-year Plan [2006BAF03A13]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Physical model experiments have been conducted to investigate the effects of multihole orifices in the upleg snorkel on bubble behaviour and decarburisation rate during Ruhrstahl-Heraeus refining. Bubble behaviour was recorded by a high speed video camera and a volumetric mass transfer coefficient kA/V was used to evaluate the decarburisation rate. Measurement of the volumetric mass transfer coefficient kA/V was made by means of the CO2 desorption from a NaOH solution. Pictures of bubble behaviour show that gas bubbles are generated separately from the multihole orifice in the low region of gas flowrate, but they tend to coalesce at high gas flowrate. It was demonstrated that kA/V increases with increasing gas flowrate and decreasing orifice hole diameter. In the low region of gas flowrate, kA/V for multihole orifices is larger than that for one-hole orifices. In this case, kA/V increases as the number of holes increases, and the hole distance of orifice has little effect on kA/V. However, in the high region of gas flowrate, kA/V for multihole orifices is lower than that for one-hole orifices, and kA/V decreases with the increase in orifice interhole distance. It was found that there exists a critical gas flowrate, above which kA/V for multihole orifices is lower than that for one-hole orifices. This critical value increases with increasing hole distance and hole number. Some explanations were also made in terms of bubble behaviour.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available