4.5 Article

Synthesis and characterization of multi-wall carbon nanotubes supported-hydrated iron phosphate cathode material for lithium-ion cells by a novel homogeneous precipitation method

Journal

IONICS
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages 721-729

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-012-0681-4

Keywords

Lithium-ion cells; Hydrated iron phosphate; Carbon nanotubes; Homogeneous precipitation

Funding

  1. United Fund of NSFC [U1137602]
  2. United Fund of Yunnan Province [U1137602]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province [10KJB150007]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Iron phosphate (FePO4) is a promising candidate for the cathode material in lithium-ion cells due to its easy synthesis and low cost. However, the intrinsic drawbacks of FePO4 material (i.e., the low electronic conductivity and the low lithium-ion diffusion coefficient) result in poor capacity. To overcome the shortcomings, multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) supported hydrated iron phosphate nanocomposites (FePO4 center dot 2H(2)O/MWNTs) are prepared using a novel homogeneous precipitation method. Meanwhile, the formation mechanism of highly dispersed and ultrafine FePO4 center dot 2H(2)O nanoparticles is discussed in detail. Electrochemical measurements show that FePO4 center dot 2H(2)O/MWNTs nanocomposites have a superior discharge capacity and stability. For example, FePO4 center dot 2H(2)O/MWNTs nanocomposites exhibit a high initial discharge capacity (129.9 mAhg(-1)) and a stable capacity retention (114.3 mAhg(-1) after 20 cycles). The excellent electrochemical performance is attributed to the small particle size of FePO4 center dot 2H(2)O nanoparticles, the good electronic conductivity of MWNTs, and the three-dimensional conductive network structure of FePO4 center dot 2H(2)O/MWNTs nanocomposites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available