Journal
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 8, Pages 475-481Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182562ab9
Keywords
computed tomography; gold nanoparticles; contrast agents; iodine
Funding
- National Institutes of Health [R01 HL71021, R01 HL78667, R01 EB009638, K99 EB012165]
- American Heart Association [09POST2220194]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose: Gold nanoparticles (gold-NPs) have lately been proposed as alternative contrast agents to iodine-based contrast agents (iodine-CA) for computed tomography (CT) angiography. The aims of this study were to confirm an appropriate environment in which to evaluate such novel contrast agents, to investigate the comparative contrast of iodine-CA versus gold-NP, and to determine optimal scanning parameters for gold-NP. Materials and Methods: Three different clinical scanners were used to acquire CT images. A range of concentrations (10 mM to 1.5 M) of gold-NP and iodine-CA were scanned with varying x-ray tube voltages and currents, reconstruction kernels, protocols, and scanner models. The different environments investigated were air, water, and water with a bone simulant (Ca-3(PO4)(2)). Regression coefficients were derived from the attenuation values plotted against concentration and compared for statistical significance using t values. Results: As expected, contrast was linearly related to concentrations up to 500 to 1000 mM, depending on the conditions used, whereupon a plateau of 3000 Hounsfield units was reached. Attenuation was significantly different depending on the environment used (air, water, or water and bone simulant). Contrast is dependent on the x-ray tube voltage used, with the contrast produced from iodine-CA sharply declining with increasing voltage, whereas the contrast of gold-NP varied less with tube voltage but was maximal at 120 kV in water with bone simulant. Current, reconstruction kernels, protocols, and scanner model had less effect on contrast. Conclusion: Water with a bone simulant is a preferable environment for evaluating novel cardiac CT contrast agents. Relative iodine-CA versus gold-NP contrast is dependent on the scanning conditions used. Optimal scanning conditions for gold-NP will likely use an x-ray tube voltage of 120 kV.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available