4.6 Article

Retention of Iodine and Expression of Biomarkers for Renal Damage in the Kidney After Application of Iodinated Contrast Media in Rats

Journal

INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 114-123

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318190fbd2

Keywords

contrast media; Iodixanol; Iopromide; hypoxia; retention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Commercially available iodinated contrast media (CM) show significantly different physico-chemical properties. The relevance of the viscosity of CM may be underestimated as a contributing factor for clinically relevant renal failure as Suggested by it large registry data analysis (Swedish registry study). The objective of this preclinical Study is to assess differences of a low and high-viscous CM regarding their retention time in the kidney. Furthermore. we investigated the expression of marker genes for renal damage and hypoxia to evaluate a potential renal damage and hypoxia after application of iodinated CM. Material and Methods: After application of Iopromide 300 and Iodixanol 320 CM, the iodine concentration over time was determined using computed tomography and x-ray fluorescence analysis in healthy Han Wistar and renally impaired ZSFI rats. The latter served as a model for age and diabetes-related renal impairment. X-ray attenuation (Hounsfield units) in the renal cortex was analyzed by 2 independent blinded readers. Furthermore. the expression of kidney injury molecule 1 (Kim-1/Haver 1) and heme oxgenase 1(HO-1/HMOX1) was measured by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain-reaction. Results: Computed tomography and x-ray fluorescence analysis in the kidneys of animals treated with Iodixanol revealed significantly prolonged retention of iodine in the kidney as compared with animals treated with Iopromide. This difference was even more pronounced in renally impaired rats. Twenty-four hours after Iodixanol treatment, significantly increased levels of Kim1/Haver1 and HO-1/HMOX1 transcript levels were observed compared with the saline and Iopromide treatment. Conclusions: A prolonged retention of contrast media in the kidney was observed after administration of dimeric CM (Iodixanol 320). One possible explanation for this effect could be the high viscosity of the dimeric CM (Iodixanol 320) and the lack of dilution by osmotic diuresis. This prolonged exposure is possibly associated with higher renal toxicity as indicated by the elevated expression of biomarkers for hypoxia and renal injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available