4.6 Article

Determinants of information retweeting in microblogging

Journal

INTERNET RESEARCH
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 443-466

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/10662241211250980

Keywords

Microblogging; Information retweeting; Emergency event; Heuristic-Systematic Model (HSM); Sentiment mining; Social media; Blogs; China

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [90924020]
  2. PhD Program Foundation of Education Ministry of China [200800060005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to propose a conceptual model to investigate the determinants of information retweeting in microblogging based on Heuristic-Systematic Model. Design/methodology/approach - Microblogging data about emergency events from Sina microblogging (http://weibo.com) are collected and analyzed with text mining technology. The proposed hypotheses are tested with logistic and multiple linear regressions. Findings - The results show that source trustworthiness, source expertise, source attractiveness, and the number of multimedia have significant effects on the information retweeting. In addition, source expertise moderates the effects of user trustworthiness and content objectivity on the information retweeting in microblogging. Practical implications - This study provides an in-depth understanding of what makes information about emergency events in microblogging diffuse so rapidly. Based on these findings the emergency management organizations in China can apply the microblogging to spread useful information, and these findings also provide practical implications for microblogging system designers. Originality/value - The primary value of this paper lies in providing a better understanding of information retweeting in microblogging based on Heuristic-Systematic Model. Organizations that would like to adopt the microblogging platform in emergency situations to improve the ability of emergency response can benefit from the findings of this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available