4.4 Article

Apparent diffusion coefficient value as a biomarker reflecting morphological and biological features of prostate cancer

Journal

INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages 555-561

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-013-0557-1

Keywords

Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Prostatic neoplasms; Biological markers; Ki-67 Antigen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To assess whether there is an association between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and the pathological characteristics of prostate cancer. The study cohort consisted of 29 consecutive patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. All patients underwent diffusion-weighted MRI before the prostate biopsy. In 42 tumor foci, the associations of the ADC values with the clinicopathological characteristics and Ki-67 labeling index (LI) were analyzed. High-grade cancers (Gleason score [GS] a parts per thousand yen 4 + 3), larger cancers (maximum diameter (MD) a parts per thousand yen 16 mm), and highly proliferating cancers (Ki-67 LI a parts per thousand yen 4.43 %) had significantly lower ADC values, respectively (P < .001, P = .008, and P = .044, respectively). There was no significant difference in ADC value according to age, prostate-specific antigen, presence of extra-prostatic extension, and intra-tumoral stroma proportion. Multivariate analysis showed that GS, Ki-67 LI, and MD had independent and significant correlations with ADC value (P < .001, P = .006, and P = .002, respectively). Low ADC tumors (< 0.52 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) are likely to be high-grade cancer foci compared with high ADC tumors (relative risk: 65.2). The sensitivity and specificity of the ADC value to predict high-grade cancer foci are 81.8 and 93.5 %, respectively. A low ADC value reflects the morphological and biological features of prostate cancer. Analyzing the ADC value may make it possible to more precisely predict the cancer aggressiveness of each focus before treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available