4.4 Article

Arginase type I as a marker of coronary heart disease in hemodialysis patients

Journal

INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages 1187-1194

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-010-9842-4

Keywords

Hemodialysis; Atherosclerosis; Coronary heart disease; Arginase; Nitric oxide; Inflammation; Interleukin-6; Tumor necrosis factor-alpha

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cardiovascular disease, and mainly coronary heart disease (CHD), is the leading cause of death in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Non-traditional risk factors may play an important role in this population. Arginase is known to contribute directly to atherosclerosis progression and to counteract the beneficial effects of nitric oxide. HD could be considered as an inflammatory condition. Inflammation contributes to atherosclerosis progression and influences both arginase and nitric oxide synthase expression. In the present study, serum arginase type I was evaluated as a marker of CHD in HD patients. The markers of inflammation interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) were also assessed. Sixty-eight HD patients and 24 healthy volunteers were enrolled into the study. Twenty HD patients suffered from CHD confirmed with coronary angiography, while the remaining 48 HD patients were asymptomatic. Serum arginase type I, IL-6 and TNF-alpha were measured with ELISA. During 24 months follow-up, none of the asymptomatic subjects developed symptoms of CHD. IL-6 and TNF-alpha levels were increased in HD patients, but did not differ between HD patients with or without CHD. On the contrary, arginase levels did not differ between healthy subjects and HD patients, but were twice higher in HD patients with CHD than in HD patients without CHD (22.41 +/- A 15.47 ng/ml vs. 10.16 +/- A 8.13 ng/ml). Arginase type I may contribute to the pathogenesis of CHD in HD patients and its serum levels could be used as a marker of CHD in this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available