Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.POP-Q stage I prolapse: Is it time to alter our terminology?
Philip Toozs-Hobson et al.
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL (2014)
POP-Q 2.0: its time has come!
Oz Harmanli
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL (2014)
The POP-Q system: two decades of progress and debate
Richard C. Bump
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL (2014)
What is clinically relevant prolapse? An attempt at defining cutoffs for the clinical assessment of pelvic organ descent
H. P. Dietz et al.
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL (2014)
The inter-system association between the simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (S-POP) and the standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) in describing pelvic organ prolapse
Jittima Manonai et al.
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL (2011)
A simple teaching tool for training the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system
Ingrid M. Geiss et al.
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL (2007)
Share Paper
