4.7 Article

Molecular Modeling as a Predictive Tool for the Development of Solid Dispersions

Journal

MOLECULAR PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 1040-1049

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/mp500510m

Keywords

solid dispersions; quantum mechanics; molecular modeling; miscibility; drug-polymer interactions

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L000253/1, EP/M022609/1, EP/J003921/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. EPSRC [EP/M022609/1, EP/J003921/1, EP/L000253/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study molecular modeling is introduced as a novel approach for the development of pharmaceutical solid dispersions. A computational model based on quantum mechanical (QM) calculations was used to predict the miscibility of various drugs in various polymers by predicting the binding strength between the drug and dimeric form of the polymer. The drug/polymer miscibility was also estimated by using traditional approaches such as Van Krevelen/Hoftyzer and Bagley solubility parameters or FloryHuggins interaction parameter in comparison to the molecular modeling approach. The molecular modeling studies predicted successfully the drugpolymer binding energies and the preferable site of interaction between the functional groups. The drugpolymer miscibility and the physical state of bulk materials, physical mixtures, and solid dispersions were determined by thermal analysis (DSC/MTDSC) and X-ray diffraction. The produced solid dispersions were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), which confirmed not only the exact type of the intermolecular interactions between the drugpolymer functional groups but also the binding strength by estimating the N coefficient values. The findings demonstrate that QM-based molecular modeling is a powerful tool to predict the strength and type of intermolecular interactions in a range of drug/polymeric systems for the development of solid dispersions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available