4.5 Review

First principles modelling of free-radical polymerisation kinetics

Journal

INTERNATIONAL REVIEWS IN PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 467-513

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0144235X.2013.797277

Keywords

quantum chemistry; molecular orbital calculations; density functional theory; kinetic modelling; radical polymerisation; free-radical copolymerisation; poly(vinyl chloride) defect structures; reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerisation

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) under their Centres of Excellence Programme
  2. ARC Future Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Computational quantum chemistry can make valuable contributions to modelling and improving free radical polymerisation. At a microscopic level, it can assist in establishing reaction mechanisms and structure-reactivity trends; at a macroscopic level it can be used in the design and parameterisation of accurate kinetic models for process optimisation and control. This review outlines and critically evaluates various methodological approaches that have been employed in first principles prediction of rate coefficients in free radical polymerisation, examining in turn the choice of chemical model, electronic structure method, solvation modelling and the coupled issues of partition function evaluation and conformational analysis. It is shown that accurate and reliable predictions are possible but only if necessary precautions are taken into account. The practical value of accurate computational modelling of radical polymerisation kinetics is then illustrated through three representative case studies from the literature in which theory has been used to develop accurate kinetic models: free radical copolymerisation kinetics; defect structure formation in radical suspension polymerisation of vinyl chloride; and reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer polymerisation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available