4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Stroke After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Outcomes in the Continuous-Flow Era

Journal

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 100, Issue 2, Pages 535-541

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.02.094

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used in patients with heart failure. To study the impact of stroke on clinical outcomes after continuous-flow (CF-) LVAD implantation, we evaluated our single-center experience. Methods. From 2006 to 2013, we implanted the Heart-Mate II CF-LVAD in 230 patients. We used standard statistical methods to evaluate our results. Results. Of our study group, 185 patients (80.4%) received the CF-LVAD as a bridge to transplantation. Strokes occurred in a total of 39 patients (17%), an incidence rate of 0.064 strokes per person-year: 19 (48.7%) were embolic, and 20 (51.3%) were hemorrhagic. The stroke-free rate at 6 months after Heart-Mate II implantation was 92.6%, at 12 months, 89.6%, and at 24 months, 86.1%. Baseline demographic characteristics did not differ significantly, except that stroke patients had a lower incidence of coronary artery disease (p = 0.004) and prior cardiac surgery (p = 0.001). We noted a trend toward an increased risk of stroke in patients with CF-LVAD-related infections (p = 0.053). The survival rate in stroke (versus stroke-free) patients at 6 months was 84.6% (versus 84.2%); at 12 months, 71.8% (versus 81.6%); and at 24 months, 53.9% (versus 74.7%; p = 0.0019). During a median follow-up time of 761 days, mortality risk in stroke patients was 2.01 times that of stroke-free patients (hazard ratio = 2.01; p = 0.004). Conclusions. Stroke while on CF-LVAD support was associated with significant mortality. To reduce the risk of stroke, it is essential to further elucidate risk factors, to optimize anticoagulation, and to further understand the impact of LVAD-related infections. (C) 2015 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available