4.5 Article

Screening properties of the German IQCODE with a two-year time frame in MCI and early Alzheimer's disease

Journal

INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 91-100

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1041610209990962

Keywords

informant report; dementia screening; cognition; cognitive decline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) is a widely used screening tool for dementia. We aimed to determine the ability of the German version of the 16-item IQCODE with a two-year time frame to discriminate healthy mature control participants (NC) from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and probable early Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients (all with Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) scores >= 24/30) and to optimize diagnostic discriminability by shortening the IQCODE. Methods: 453 NC (49.7% women, age = 69.5 years +/- 8.2, education = 12.2 +/- 2.9), 172 MCI patients (41.9%, women, age = 71.5 years +/- 8.8, education = 12.3 +/- 3.1) and 208 AD patients (59.1%, women, age = 76.0 years +/- 6.4, education = 11.4 +/- 2.9) participated. Stepwise binary logistic regression analyses (LR) were used to shorten the test. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) determined sensitivities, specificities, and correct classification rates (CCRs) for (a) NC vs. all patients, (b) NC vs. MCI;- and (c) NC vs. AD patients. Results: The mean IQCODE was 3.00 for NC, 3.35 for MCI, and 3.73 for AD. CCRS were 85.5%, (NC-patient group), 79.9% (NC-MCI), and 90.7% (NC-AD), respectively. The diagnostic discriminability of the shortened 7-item IQCODE (i.e. items 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14) was comparable with the longer version (i.e. 7-item CCRs: NC-patient group: 85.3%; NC-MCL 80.1%, NC-AD: 90.5%,). Conclusions: The German 16-item IQCODE with two-year time frame showed excellent screening properties for MCI and early AD patients. An abbreviated 7-item version demonstrated equally high diagnostic discriminability, thus allowing for more economical screening.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available