4.5 Article

The Mini-mental State Examination revisited: ceiling and floor effects after score adjustment for educational level in an aging Mexican population

Journal

INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 72-81

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1041610209990822

Keywords

MMSE ceiling effects; MMSE floor effects; cognitive impairment; seven-minute screen; MMSE serial-sevens; MMSE education adjustment

Funding

  1. CONACYT (Mexico) [2002-C01-6868]
  2. Mexican Institute of Social Security [IMSS 2002-382]
  3. NIH-FIRCA [R03 TW005888]
  4. NIDA [DA 17796-01]
  5. NCMHHD [P60-MD002217-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) is the most widely used cognitive test, both in clinical settings and in epidemiological studies. However, correcting its score for education may create ceiling effects when used for poorly educated people and floor effects for those with higher education. Methods: MMSE and a recent cognitive test, the seven minute screen (7MS), were serially administered to a community sample of Mexican elderly. 7MS test scores were equated to MMSE scores. MMSE-equated 7MS differences indicated ceiling or floor effects. An ordinal logistic regression model was fitted to identify predictors of such effects. Results: Poorly educated persons were more prevalent on the side of MMSE ceiling effects. Concentration (serial-sevens), orientation and memory were the three MMSE subscales showing the strongest relationship to MMSE ceiling effects in the multivariate model. Conclusion: Even when MMSE scores are corrected for educational level they still have ceiling and floor effects. These effects should be considered when interpreting data from longitudinal studies of cognitive decline. When an education-adjusted MMSE test is used to screen for cognitive impairment, additional testing may be required to rule out the possibility of mild cognitive impairment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available