4.5 Article

Single stage corpectomy and instrumentation in the treatment of pathological fractures in the lumbar spine

Journal

INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 111-117

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1288-5

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Corpectomy and implantation of titanium cages is standard in pathological fracture treatment but additional single ventral instrumentation remains controversial with regard to rotational stability. This study included 45 patients suffering from vertebral metastases with spinal stenosis, instability and/or neurological deficits secondary to pathological lumbar spine fractures and bone mineral density (BMD) a parts per thousand yen1.20 g/cm(2). The clinical results of a single stage anterior decompression with corpectomy defect restoration with titanium cage and single double rod system in patients were evaluated at mean 36 months postoperatively with follow-up neurological and radiological exams at three months then every six months. Evaluation of neurological recovery included grading following a modified Frankel scale. Contentment, disability and actual pain were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI). BMD was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Postoperative neurological evaluations showed improvement in all patients. In the radiological follow-up in 40 patients (89%) findings were similar compared to the postoperative control. In five patients (11%) a loss of correction at a mean of 8A degrees degrees (Cobb angle) secondary to cage subsidence occurred. No breakage of the device or displacement of the instrumentation was seen. Overall the Frankel scale improved 0.65 points (p < 0.05) and the ODI improved 40.69 points (p < 0.05). In lumbar spine fractures of metastatic origin with stenosis, instability and/or neurological deficit, a single stage ventral decompression and instrumentation in patients with BMD a parts per thousand yen1.20 g/cm(2) should be considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available