4.5 Review

A review of logistic regression models used to predict post-fire tree mortality of western North American conifers

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 1-35

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/WF09039

Keywords

fire behaviour; fire injury; modelling; prescribed fire; wildland fire

Categories

Funding

  1. Western Wildland Environmental Threat Assessment Center, US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station [PNW 07-JV-11261900-075]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Logistic regression models used to predict tree mortality are critical to post-fire management, planning prescribed burns and understanding disturbance ecology. We review literature concerning post-fire mortality prediction using logistic regression models for coniferous tree species in the western USA. We include synthesis and review of: methods to develop, evaluate and interpret logistic regression models; explanatory variables in logistic regression models; factors influencing scope of inference and model limitations; model validation; and management applications. Logistic regression is currently the most widely used and available technique for predicting post-fire tree mortality. Over 100 logistic regression models have been developed to predict post-fire tree mortality for 19 coniferous species following wild and prescribed fires. The most widely used explanatory variables in post-fire tree mortality logistic regression models have been measurements of crown (e.g. crown scorch) and stem (e.g. bole char) injury. Prediction of post-fire tree mortality improves when crown and stem variables are used collectively. Logistic regression models that predict post-fire tree mortality are the basis of simple field tools and contribute to larger fire-effects models. Future post-fire tree mortality prediction models should include consistent definition of model variables, model validation and direct incorporation of physiological responses that link to process modelling efforts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available