4.5 Article

Abiotic and biotic influences on Bromus tectorum invasion and Artemisia tridentata recovery after fire

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 597-604

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/WF09082

Keywords

fire effects; Great Basin; landscape-scale; structural equation modelling; succession

Categories

Funding

  1. Joint Fire Sciences Program [05-JFSP-2-1-94]
  2. USDA Forest Service
  3. Rocky Mountain Research Station
  4. Nevada Agricultural Experimental Station

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Native sagebrush ecosystems in the Great Basin (western USA) are often invaded following fire by exotic Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass), a highly flammable annual grass. Once B. tectorum is established, higher fire frequencies can lead to local extirpation of Artemisia tridentata ssp. vaseyana (mountain big sagebrush) and have cascading effects on sagebrush ecosystems and the species that depend on them. We conducted a landscape-scale observational study to examine the distribution and cover of B. tectorum and A. tridentata 6 years after a large wildland fire. We used structural equation models to quantify the interacting influences of pre-fire tree canopy cover, perennial species cover, distance from potential seed source, and site environment on post-fire cover of B. tectorum and A. tridentata. Results confirmed a hypothesised negative effect of pre-fire tree canopy cover on post-fire cover of A. tridentata. Site-and landscape-level abiotic factors influenced pre-fire tree canopy cover, which, in turn, influenced the probability of rapid recovery to A. tridentata. However, B. tectorum cover was primarily influenced by a positive effect of incident solar radiation and a negative effect of perennial herbaceous species cover. Restoration efforts to reduce tree canopy cover should be limited to productive sites with sufficient cover of perennial herbaceous species to facilitate site recovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available