4.6 Article

Plasma miR-221/222 Family as Novel Descriptive and Prognostic Biomarkers for Glioma

Journal

MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages 1452-1460

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12035-014-9079-9

Keywords

microRNA-221; microRNA-222; Plasma; Screening; Prognosis; Glioma; Meta-analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Development Project of Shandong Province, China [2014GGB14439, 2014GGB14257]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glioma, the most common type of primary central nervous system cancers, was progressive with poor survival. MicroRNA, as a novel biomarker, was suspected to be novel biomarkers for glioma diagnosis and prognosis. The study aimed at investigating the diagnostic and predictive value of miR-221/222 family for glioma. In the first phase, we compared plasma miR-221/222 family levels between 50 glioma patients and 51 healthy controls by real-time qRT-PCR amplification. Meanwhile, a meta-analysis based on published studies and presents study was performed to explore the diagnostic performance of miR-221/222 family in human cancers. In the second phase, we correlated the miR-221/222 family expression level with prognosis of glioma using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The plasma miR-221/222 family levels were found to be significantly upregulated in glioma patients (P = 0.001). The ROC curve analysis yielded an AUC values of 0.84 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.74-0.93) for miR-221 and 0.92 (95 % CI 0.87-0.94) for miR-222. In the meta-analysis, the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) was plotted with an AUC of 0.82 (95 % CI 0.78-0.85) for miR-221/222 family. It was also demonstrated that high positive plasma miR-221 and miR-222 were both correlated with poor survival rate (miR-221: HR = 2.13; 95 % CI, 1.05-4.31; miR-222: HR = 2.09; 95 % CI, 1.00-4.37). This study demonstrated that the detection of the miRNA-221/222 family should be considered as a new additional tool to better characterize glioma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available