4.5 Article

Deciphering the metabolic response of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to nitrogen stress

Journal

MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 97, Issue 6, Pages 1142-1157

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mmi.13091

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MRC
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, UK [BB/G020434/1]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G020434/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. BBSRC [BB/G020434/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [MR/J006874/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A key component to the success of Mycobacterium tuberculosis as a pathogen is the ability to sense and adapt metabolically to the diverse range of conditions encountered in vivo, such as oxygen tension, environmental pH and nutrient availability. Although nitrogen is an essential nutrient for every organism, little is known about the genes and pathways responsible for nitrogen assimilation in M. tuberculosis. In this study we have used transcriptomics and chromatin immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing to address this. In response to nitrogen starvation, a total of 185 genes were significantly differentially expressed (96 up-regulated and 89 down regulated; 5% genome) highlighting several significant areas of metabolic change during nitrogen limitation such as nitrate/nitrite metabolism, aspartate metabolism and changes in cell wall biosynthesis. We identify GlnR as a regulator involved in the nitrogen response, controlling the expression of at least 33 genes in response to nitrogen limitation. We identify a consensus GlnR binding site and relate its location to known transcriptional start sites. We also show that the GlnR response regulator plays a very different role in M. tuberculosis to that in non-pathogenic mycobacteria, controlling genes involved in nitric oxide detoxification and intracellular survival instead of genes involved in nitrogen scavenging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available