4.3 Review

Delays in diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in India: a systematic review

Journal

Publisher

INT UNION AGAINST TUBERCULOSIS LUNG DISEASE (I U A T L D)
DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.13.0585

Keywords

tuberculosis; delayed diagnosis; delivery of health care; care seeking behaviour; India

Funding

  1. Research Institute of McGill University Health Centre
  2. Centre for Operational Research, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France
  3. Harvard T32 post-doctoral HIV Clinical Research Fellowship (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) [AI 007433]
  4. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec-Sante
  5. EDTCP (TB NEAT grant)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review Indian literature on delays in tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: We searched multiple sources for studies on delays in patients with pulmonary TB and those with chest symptoms. Studies were included if numeric data on any delay were reported. Patient delay was defined as the interval between onset of symptoms and the patient's first contact with a health care provider. Diagnostic delay was defined as the interval between the first consultation with a health care provider and diagnosis. Treatment delay was defined as the interval between diagnosis and initiation of anti-tuberculosis treatment. Total delay was defined as time interval from the onset of symptoms until treatment initiation. RESULTS: Among 541 potential citations identified, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria. Included studies used a variety of definitions for onset of symptoms and delays. Median estimates of patient, diagnostic and treatment delay were respectively 18.4 (IQR 14.3-27.0), 31.0 (IQR 24.5-35.4) and 2.5 days (IQR 1.9-3.6) for patients with TB and those with chest symptoms combined. The median total delay was 55.3 days (IQR 46.5-61.5). About 48% of all patients first consulted private providers; an average of 2.7 health care providers were consulted before diagnosis. Number and type of provider first consulted were the most important risk factors for delay. CONCLUSIONS: These findings underscore the need to develop novel strategies for reducing patient and diagnostic delays and engaging first-contact health care providers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available