4.3 Article

Epidemiology of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in the United States, 1993-2008

Journal

Publisher

INT UNION AGAINST TUBERCULOSIS LUNG DISEASE (I U A T L D)
DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.11.0794

Keywords

tuberculosis; diagnosis; smear microscopy

Funding

  1. Division of Tuberculosis Elimination (DTBE), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
  2. Doris Duke Clinical Scientist Development Award
  3. CDC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Smear-negative tuberculosis (TB) is difficult to diagnose and has been associated with poor treatment outcomes and excessive mortality, particularly in high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalent settings. However, few studies have used mycobacterial culture to rigorously confirm all smear-negative TB cases in a population-based cohort. DESIGN: We included all culture-confirmed, pulmonary TB cases reported to the US National TB Surveillance System from 1993 to 2008. We analyzed smear-negative TB risk factors and survival, as compared to smear-positive TB. We calculated prevalence ratios (PRs) and adjusted for confounders (aPR). RESULTS: From 1993 to 2008, 159 121 cases of culture-confirmed pulmonary TB were reported in the United States, of which 58 786 (37%) were sputum smear-negative. Smear-negative TB cases were more likely to be foreign-born (aPR 1.10, 95%CI 1.08-1.12), incarcerated (aPR 1.52, 95%CI 1.48-1.56) or HIV-infected (aPR 1.27, 95%CI 1.24-1.30). Hispanics and non-Hispanic Blacks were less likely to have smear-negative TB (respectively aPR 0.87, 95%CI 0.85-0.89 and aPR 0.90, 95%CI 0.89-0.92). Smear-negative TB cases had lower mortality (aRR 0.78, 95%CI 0.74-0.81), independent of HIV status. CONCLUSION: Smear-negative TB represents a large proportion of TB cases in the United States, and occurs more often among persons in groups more likely to undergo TB screening. The lower mortality may indicate earlier TB detection, and underscores the need for continued vigilance in screening of high-risk persons.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available