4.5 Article

Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells rescue injured H9c2 cells via transferring intact mitochondria through tunneling nanotubes in an in vitro simulated ischemia/reperfusion model

Journal

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 1517-1524

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2015.4726

Keywords

mesenchymal stem cells; co-culture system; ischemia/reperfusion injury; apoptosis; mitochondrial dysfunction; tunneling nanotubes

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81300178, 81370401]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is considered to be a promising treatment for ischemic heart disease; however, the therapeutic effects and underlying mechanisms of action require further evaluation. Mitochondrial dysfunction is a key event in simulated ischemia/reperfusion (SI/R) injury. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the mechanism of mitochondrial transfer, which may be involved the antiapoptotic action of co-culture with MSCs. An in vitro model of simulated ischemia/reperfusion (SI/R) was used in the present study. The apoptotic indexes were significantly increased when H9c2 cardiomyocytes were induced in the SI/R group. Following co-culture with bone marrow-derived (BM)-MSCs, H9c2 cells exhibited marked resistance against the SI/R-induced apoptotic process. Besides, mitochondrial transfer via a tunneling nanotube (TNT) like structure was detected by confocal fluorescent microscopy. In addition, following pretreated with latrunculin-A (LatA), an inhibitor of TNT formation, the BM-MSCs were not able to rescue injured H9c2 cells from apoptosis, as previously observed. In conclusion, the anti-apoptotic ability of BM-MSCs may be partially attributed to the recovery of mitochondrial dysfunction in SI/R, and the formation of TNTs appears to be involved in this action of mitochondrial transfer between adjacent cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available